PoliRural+ — Bridging Rural and Urban Europe · knowledge baseInteractive book · llms.txt · For AI agents

Vulture and MapWhiteboard

One tool works on your own inbox, the other on a map that a whole workshop edits at once. What each really does, and how mature it is.

How do Vulture and MapWhiteboard differ in purpose and maturity?

Vulture is a personal AI sandbox: forwarded e-mails and crawled web pages go into a private collection you can question (Vidzeme uses it for policy monitoring); in the Beta it has become less central. MapWhiteboard is a shared map with live cursors and features; a simplified instance is deployed and it supports pilot discussions about boundaries, corridors and land use.

Open in the interactive book · missions, mini-games and memory cards there

Opposite jobs: a private sandbox and a shared mapVulture is a personal sandbox: a user forwards e-mails, PDFs and clippings into a private collection that only they can see, and GPT-4o answers from it. It was an alpha in D4.1 and became less central in the Beta. MapWhiteboard is a shared map where a group sees each other's cursors and drawn features; D4.1 rated the fuller tool TRL 7, and the Beta has a new simplified instance. Opposite jobs: a private sandbox and a shared map Vulture: a private sandbox MapWhiteboard: one shared map private collection GPT-4oanswer forward e-mails, PDFs, web clippings or WhatsAppmessages: a deliberate act, linked to GDPRonly that user can see the collectionregister URLs to crawl for topics you care about alpha (D4.1)Beta: less central than expected Pilot use: the Vidzeme Planning Region monitors andanalyses policy developments. A B C shared cursors between OpenLayers mapsfeatures exchanged between vector layersnot yet: moderation, saved annotations D4.1: TRL 7 (fuller tool)Beta: new simplified instance Pilot use: in County Monaghan, technical pilot TP1combines it with action-foresight and system dynamics. NEXT D4.2 wants MapWhiteboard and the MAA tool built into RAP and foresight workflows instead of running asseparate applications. Source: D4.1 PoliRuralPlus platform design §6.4, §6.9; D4.2 PoliRuralPlus Platform Beta §3.5, §3.8, §6.3, §11.1; project fact sheet
Vulture is a personal sandbox: a user forwards e-mails, PDFs and clippings into a private collection that only they can see, and GPT-4o answers from it. It was an alpha in D4.1 and became less central in the Beta. MapWhiteboard is a shared map where a group sees each other's cursors and drawn features; D4.1 rated the fuller tool TRL 7, and the Beta has a new simplified instance.

Vulture and MapWhiteboard: a private sandbox and a shared map

main tellingdepth: standard3 min markdown

These two tools have opposite jobs. Vulture is a personal sandbox for AI experiments on your own material. MapWhiteboard is a shared map where a group works on the same view at the same time.

Vulture: a sandbox, not a core service

Vulture was built for user needs identified in the WP3 buddy exercises (D4.1 §6.4). Users forward e-mails to a dedicated address, with PDFs, web clippings or WhatsApp messages attached. Forwarding is a deliberate act, which D4.1 links to GDPR compliance. Each item lands in a private collection that only that user can see. It is split into chunks and embedded in a Qdrant vector database, and the user can then ask questions in plain language; GPT-4o writes the answer from the retrieved context. Users can also register URLs for Vulture to crawl for topics they care about.

Pilot use: in the Latvian pilot, the Vidzeme Planning Region uses Vulture to monitor and analyse policy developments (D4.1 §6.4).

Status: an alpha in D4.1. In the Beta it has “remained largely stable and has become less central than originally expected”, partly because tools such as OpenClaw and more integrated AI workflows elsewhere took over some of its role. Its outputs are provisional and lack the reproducibility and provenance guarantees of the core services. D4.2 therefore plans selective maintenance: functions that prove useful move into structured platform services (D4.2 §3.5).

MapWhiteboard: working together on one map

D4.1 compares MapWhiteboard to Miro and Figma, applied to maps. It lists pre-defined maps with editable layers, GeoJSON upload and download, WMS layers, shared cursors, simultaneous editing, user-created layers and publishing of features through web services. The tool is built on OpenLayers and HSLayers-NG with a WebSocket API, and D4.1 rates it TRL 7 (D4.1 §6.9).

Status: for the Beta, a new simplified instance has been developed and deployed. It exchanges cursors between OpenLayers maps and features between vector layers. That covers basic shared navigation and shared objects, but it is not yet a full participatory planning suite with moderation and saved annotations (D4.2 §3.8).

Pilot use: MapWhiteboard supported collaborative spatial interpretation wherever pilots had to discuss boundaries, corridors, land use, infrastructure or local assets (D4.2 §6.3). In County Monaghan, technical pilot TP1 combines it with action-foresight and system dynamics to define and implement the rural-urban RAP (project fact sheet).

D4.2 wants MapWhiteboard and the MAA tool built into RAP and foresight workflows instead of running as separate applications (§11.1).

How-to: Using Vulture · Running a MapWhiteboard session.

How to use Vulture: forward, ask, crawl

another tellingexample world: latviadepth: intro..standard2 min markdown

When to use it: you receive a steady stream of calls, newsletters and policy updates and want to ask questions across all of it, or to keep watch on a few web pages.

What you need

Steps

  1. Forward content to Vulture’s dedicated address, by hand or with an automatic rule: e-mails with attachments, PDFs, web clippings or WhatsApp messages from any device or e-mail client.
  2. Decide each time what goes in. Forwarding is deliberate by design; D4.1 ties this to GDPR compliance and data security.
  3. Let it index. Each item is validated, analysed for context, chunked and embedded into your private collection in a Qdrant vector database. Only you can access it.
  4. Ask in plain language. Vulture retrieves the most similar chunks, and GPT-4o writes the answer from them. D4.1’s examples: tracking events and deadlines, identifying reports, finding funding opportunities and policy updates.
  5. Register URLs to crawl and define the questions or topics you care about; Vulture extracts the relevant information from the linked pages.
  6. Refine your prompts. D7.4’s guidance: the more you use and refine your prompts, the more precise the results become.

What you get

A self-expanding personal RAG over your own material: answers, summaries and extracted information. D4.2 calls such outputs provisional and exploratory, not formal platform evidence (§3.5).

Pilot use

In the Latvian pilot, the Vidzeme Planning Region uses Vulture’s URL crawling and targeted extraction to monitor and analyse policy developments (D4.1 §6.4).

Watch out

A shared, auditable evidence base is the job of the Advisor, not Vulture.

How to run a MapWhiteboard session with stakeholders

another tellingexample world: italy|slovakiadepth: intro..standard2 min markdown

When to use it: a meeting has to agree on something that lives on a map, such as a boundary, a corridor, a land-use conflict or local assets (D4.2 §6.3).

What you need

Steps

  1. Open the shared map. Pre-defined maps combine base layers with editable layers (D4.1 §6.9).
  2. Bring everyone in. Each connected session shows the others’ cursors live (D4.2 §3.8).
  3. Navigate together to the place in question and let people point rather than describe.
  4. Draw on the shared layer. Features drawn on a vector layer are exchanged between sessions, so each person sees the others’ lines and areas (D4.2 §3.8).
  5. Add context, where your instance supports it. D4.1 lists WMS layers, GeoJSON upload, user-created editable layers and simultaneous editing of attributes (§6.9).
  6. Secure the result. Download the drawn features as GeoJSON or publish them through web services if available (D4.1 §6.9); otherwise capture them before the session ends.

What you get

A shared visual workspace: synchronised cursors, exchanged features and a common map the group has inspected together (D4.2 §3.8).

Pilot use

Watch out

Related

Sources